The Open Dimension

Commentary on social issues; politics; religion and spirituality

My Photo
Location: Laguna Hills, California, United States

I am a semi-retired psychotherapist/psychiatric social worker and certified hypnotherapist. Originally a practicing attorney, I changed careers during the 1980's. My interests include history, constitutional law, Hindustani classical music, yoga, meditation and spirituality.

Saturday, October 26, 2013

Keys To Realization ( From The Works of Anam Thubten Rinpoche )

1. Be in the present moment - with total awareness and insight. Surrender to the present moment.

2. Melt the illusion of self and dissolve into the holiness which is life itself.

3. Let go of all ideas about life - Just drop all concepts. Drop the mind. Just drop everything.

4. Go beyond your thoughts without procrastination: This is the shortcut to enlightenment.

5. Transcend everything in the moment. Transcendent wisdom demands that we dissolve or transcend everything.

6. Surrender all concepts - and just rest and relax. No longer try to hold onto anything.

7. Nonattachment is the only path.

8. Nothing has to be done.

9. "Awareness" means letting go of all thoughts and concepts in each and every moment.

10. Thoughts and phenomena are only "real" if you become attached to them.

11. Offer all thoughts to Emptiness, to Truth. Do not believe in your mind. Do not believe in your thoughts. Dissolving into Truth is the only way.

12. Let go of the futile effort to be or become "somebody." Then freedom and enlightenment take care of themselves.

13. Dissolve attachment to any identification.

14. When we go beyond self, we go beyond every form of struggle: "No self, no problem." Dissolve the self on the spot.

15. If we just surrender and remain in te present awareness, paying attention to our breath, then amazingly the self dies.

16. See that all our "demons" are unreal.

17. Rest and relax. Surrender to the flow of all events. By maintaining nondoing awareness, all of our internal issues will vanish. Karma can be purified only by realizing the pure essence of who we are.

18. Stop all forms of searching and then witness realization right where you are.

19. Attachment to our thoughts is the only "obstacle." There are no obstacles in reality. There is nothing holding you back from awakening.

20. Transcend everything here and now.

(From Anam Thubten, The Magic of Awareness and No Self, No Problem, Shambala Publications)

Thursday, October 24, 2013


Glenn Greenwald to the Yemen Times: “Even if Hadi wants to stop using American drones, I don’t think he has the power to do that”

Published on 24 October 2013 in Interview
Sadeq Al-Wesabi(author), Sadeq Al-Wesabi(photographer)
Greenwald says U.S. counter-terrorism policy undermines U.S. national security. “[As long as] the U.S. government continues what it has been doing, which is using violence through drones in Yemen, Al-Qaeda’s strength is guaranteed.”
Greenwald says U.S. counter-terrorism policy undermines U.S. national security. “[As long as] the U.S. government continues what it has been doing, which is using violence through drones in Yemen, Al-Qaeda’s strength is guaranteed.”
Glenn Greenwald is an American journalist who reported bombshell NSA leaks for the Guardian and has received international acclaim for his writings on U.S. national security. The former Guardian columnist left his post last week and currently resides in Brazil. As part of his focus on national security, he has commented extensively on America’s counter-terrorism policy in Yemen, including the use of armed drones to battle Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).

Yemen Times interviewed Greenwald in Rio de Janeiro about the nature of relations between Yemen and the U.S. as it relates to security issues and counter-terrorism tactics.

“Obviously, the Yemeni government has been dependent on the United States government for many years,” Greenwald said. “The ability of the Yemeni government to restrict the U.S. government in terms of what it does inside Yemen is almost nothing.”

Greenwald has made it no secret in his writings that he objects to the current use of U.S. drones in both Yemen and Pakistan, two nations the U.S. has targeted with the war technology.

The American government has increasingly drawn scrutiny from the international community for its drone policy.

This week, four separate reports were issued by the United Nations, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and AlKarama calling on the U.S. to disclose more information about its covert operations and to offer more transparency about its drone program.

“The American government doesn't want Americans to ask them the question, ‘Why are there so many people who want to harm the United States?’ because that would make them question [their own] policies,” Greenwald said.

Greenwald says questioning the policies of the U.S. that contribute to anti-Americanism is non-existent in America’s political culture.

“If you start asking this question then you start to realize that one of the main answers is because the U.S. government has brought so much violence to [these targeted] parts of the world for so long.”

Over the last decade, many areas of Yemen believed to be AQAP strongholds have been targeted by American drones. Civilians, including children and women, have been killed in the bombings.

Despite criticism from human rights groups and growing anger from Yemeni and American citizens, the strikes have continued. The Yemeni government has been criticized for supporting of the American strikes. Greenwald is also critical of Yemen’s transitional president, Abdu Rabu Mansour Hadi, who has been vocal about his support of U.S. drone strikes.

“The Yemeni government needs to show the population that it’s willing to defend the sovereignty of Yemen,” said Greenwald, who said that the Yemeni government has adopted many tactics from the U.S. that hinder transparency.

Last August, President Hadi justified his decision to allow the use of drones in Yemen, defending the accuracy of the technology used. Greenwald is critical of the president’s stance.

“It’s not true that drones are precise weapons that kill only the wanted,” he said. “There is evidence that drones have killed civilians over the years in multiple countries, including Yemen.”

In a report released by Human Rights Watch Tuesday, the human rights group reveals that nearly 70 percent of those killed in a selected six drone strikes between 2009 and 2013 were civilians.

For Greenwald, the issues surrounding counter-terrorism policy are not black and white. Officials need to spend more time examining the root causes of terrorism and why extremism thrives in a country like Yemen, Greenwald said.

“In a country where there is extreme corruption, people feel as though they cannot solve problems through political processes so they turn to violence.

“When [people] are very poor and have no hope, they turn to religious extremism,” Greenwald said. “When they are being assaulted by a foreign power and watching people [being] blown up into pieces, they turn to anger, revenge and violence.”

Greenwald believes that drones create more sympathy for AQAP and groups associated with the organization.

“The ability of Al-Qaeda to capitalize on anger towards the U.S. is probably the most powerful weapon they use to strengthen themselves,” he said.

Although President Hadi recently asked the U.S. to provide Yemen with its own drones and training for Yemeni forces, Greenwald says this does not legitimize the use of the technology. He argues the issue is about “using violence itself, not who is doing it.”

When asked about his thoughts on the government holding dialogue sessions with AQAP, Greenwald responded, “I believe in improving people’s situations economically and giving them democracy [so that they can] elect their own government and have control over their own fates. But I also believe in trying to have dialogue with extremist groups.”

Greenwald says that as long as “the U.S. government continues what it has been doing, which is using violence through drones in Yemen, Al-Qaeda’s strength is guaranteed.”

“You cannot assault a population for so long without [getting] them extremely angry—this is just basic human nature,” he said.

Monday, October 21, 2013


October 21, 2013, OpEdNews

Let's Get This Class War Started
By Chris Hedges

The top 1 percent in the United States own 40 percent of the nation's wealth while the bottom 80 percent own only 7 percent. Half of the country is now classified as poor or low-income. The real value of the minimum wage has fallen by $2.77 since 1968. Oligarchs do not believe in self-sacrifice for the common good. They never have. They never will. They are the cancer of democracy.:
Source: TruthDig

Although his actual wealth has been called into question, Donald Trump has made a handsome living playing a rich person on TV.
"The rich are different from us," F. Scott Fitzgerald is said to have remarked to Ernest Hemingway, to which Hemingway allegedly replied, "Yes, they have more money."

The exchange, although it never actually took place, sums up a wisdom Fitzgerald had that eluded Hemingway. The rich are different. The cocoon of wealth and privilege permits the rich to turn those around them into compliant workers, hangers-on, servants, flatterers and sycophants. Wealth breeds, as Fitzgerald illustrated in "The Great Gatsby" and his short story "The Rich Boy," a class of people for whom human beings are disposable commodities. Colleagues, associates, employees, kitchen staff, servants, gardeners, tutors, personal trainers, even friends and family, bend to the whims of the wealthy or disappear. Once oligarchs achieve unchecked economic and political power, as they have in the United States, the citizens too become disposable.

The public face of the oligarchic class bears little resemblance to the private face. I, like Fitzgerald, was thrown into the embrace of the upper crust when young. I was shipped off as a scholarship student at the age of 10 to an exclusive New England boarding school. I had classmates whose fathers -- fathers they rarely saw -- arrived at the school in their limousines accompanied by personal photographers (and at times their mistresses), so the press could be fed images of rich and famous men playing the role of good fathers. I spent time in the homes of the ultra-rich and powerful, watching my classmates, who were children, callously order around men and women who worked as their chauffeurs, cooks, nannies and servants. When the sons and daughters of the rich get into serious trouble there are always lawyers, publicists and political personages to protect them -- George W. Bush's life is a case study in the insidious affirmative action for the rich.

The rich have a snobbish disdain for the poor -- despite well-publicized acts of philanthropy -- and the middle class. These lower classes are viewed as uncouth parasites, annoyances that have to be endured, at times placated and always controlled in the quest to amass more power and money. My hatred of authority, along with my loathing for the pretensions, heartlessness and sense of entitlement of the rich, comes from living among the privileged. It was a deeply unpleasant experience. But it exposed me to their insatiable selfishness and hedonism. I learned, as a boy, who were my enemies.

The inability to grasp the pathology of our oligarchic rulers is one of our gravest faults. We have been blinded to the depravity of our ruling elite by the relentless propaganda of public relations firms that work on behalf of corporations and the rich. Compliant politicians, clueless entertainers and our vapid, corporate-funded popular culture, which holds up the rich as leaders to emulate and assures us that through diligence and hard work we can join them, keep us from seeing the truth.
"They were careless people, Tom and Daisy," Fitzgerald wrote of the wealthy couple at the center of Gatsby's life. "They smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made."

Aristotle, Niccolo Machiavelli, Alexis de Tocqueville, Adam Smith and Karl Marx all began from the premise there is a natural antagonism between the rich and the masses. "Those who have too much of the goods of fortune, strength, wealth, friends, and the like, are neither willing nor able to submit to authority," Aristotle wrote in "Politics." "The evil begins at home; for when they are boys, by reason of the luxury in which they are brought up, they never learn, even at school, the habit of obedience." Oligarchs, these philosophers knew, are schooled in the mechanisms of manipulation, subtle and overt repression and exploitation to protect their wealth and power at our expense. Foremost among their mechanisms of control is the control of ideas. Ruling elites ensure that the established intellectual class is subservient to an ideology -- in this case free market capitalism and globalization -- that justifies their greed. "The ruling ideas are nothing more than the ideal expression of the dominant material relationships," Marx wrote, "the dominant material relationships grasped as ideas."

The blanket dissemination of the ideology of free market capitalism through the media and the purging, especially in academia, of critical voices have permitted our oligarchs to orchestrate the largest income inequality gap in the industrialized world. The top 1 percent in the United States own 40 percent of the nation's wealth while the bottom 80 percent own only 7 percent, as Joseph E. Stiglitz wrote in "The Price of Inequality." For every dollar that the wealthiest 0.1 percent amassed in 1980 they had an additional $3 in yearly income in 2008, David Cay Johnston explained in the article "9 Things the Rich Don't Want You to Know About Taxes." The bottom 90 percent, Johnson said, in the same period added only one cent. Half of the country is now classified as poor or low-income. The real value of the minimum wage has fallen by $2.77 since 1968. Oligarchs do not believe in self-sacrifice for the common good. They never have. They never will. They are the cancer of democracy.

"We Americans are not usually thought to be a submissive people, but of course we are," Wendell Berry writes. "Why else would we allow our country to be destroyed? Why else would we be rewarding its destroyers? Why else would we all -- by proxies we have given to greedy corporations and corrupt politicians -- be participating in its destruction? Most of us are still too sane to piss in our own cistern, but we allow others to do so and we reward them for it. We reward them so well, in fact, that those who piss in our cistern are wealthier than the rest of us. How do we submit? By not being radical enough. Or by not being thorough enough, which is the same thing."

The rise of an oligarchic state offers a nation two routes, according to Aristotle. The impoverished masses either revolt to rectify the imbalance of wealth and power or the oligarchs establish a brutal tyranny to keep the masses forcibly enslaved. We have chosen the second of Aristotle's options. The slow advances we made in the early 20th century through unions, government regulation, the New Deal, the courts, an alternative press and mass movements have been reversed. The oligarchs are turning us -- as they did in the 19th century steel and textile factories -- into disposable human beings. They are building the most pervasive security and surveillance apparatus in human history to keep us submissive.

This imbalance would not have disturbed most of our Founding Fathers. The Founding Fathers, largely wealthy slaveholders, feared direct democracy. They rigged our political process to thwart popular rule and protect the property rights of the native aristocracy. The masses were to be kept at bay. The Electoral College, the original power of the states to appoint senators, the disenfranchisement of women, Native Americans, African-Americans and men without property locked most people out of the democratic process at the beginning of the republic.

We had to fight for our voice. Hundreds of workers were killed and thousands were wounded in our labor wars. The violence dwarfed the labor battles in any other industrialized nation. The democratic openings we achieved were fought for and paid for with the blood of abolitionists, African-Americans, suffragists, workers and those in the anti-war and civil rights movements. Our radical movements, repressed and ruthlessly dismantled in the name of anti-communism, were the real engines of equality and social justice. The squalor and suffering inflicted on workers by the oligarchic class in the 19th century is mirrored in the present, now that we have been stripped of protection. Dissent is once again a criminal act. The Mellons, Rockefellers and Carnegies at the turn of the last century sought to create a nation of masters and serfs. The modern corporate incarnation of this 19th century oligarchic elite has created a worldwide neofeudalism, where workers across the planet toil in misery while corporate oligarchs amass hundreds of millions in personal wealth.

Class struggle defines most of human history. Marx got this right. The sooner we realize that we are locked in deadly warfare with our ruling, corporate elite, the sooner we will realize that these elites must be overthrown. The corporate oligarchs have now seized all institutional systems of power in the United States. Electoral politics, internal security, the judiciary, our universities, the arts and finance, along with nearly all forms of communication, are in corporate hands. Our democracy, with faux debates between two corporate parties, is meaningless political theater. There is no way within the system to defy the demands of Wall Street, the fossil fuel industry or war profiteers. The only route left to us, as Aristotle knew, is revolt.

It is not a new story. The rich, throughout history, have found ways to subjugate and re-subjugate the masses. And the masses, throughout history, have cyclically awoken to throw off their chains. The ceaseless fight in human societies between the despotic power of the rich and the struggle for justice and equality lies at the heart of Fitzgerald's novel, which uses the story of Gatsby to carry out a fierce indictment of capitalism. Fitzgerald was reading Oswald Spengler's "The Decline of the West" as he was writing "The Great Gatsby." Spengler predicted that, as Western democracies calcified and died, a class of "monied thugs" would replace the traditional political elites. Spengler was right about that.

"There are only two or three human stories," Willa Cather wrote, "and they go on repeating themselves as fiercely as if they had never happened before."

The seesaw of history has thrust the oligarchs once again into the sky. We sit humiliated and broken on the ground. It is an old battle. It has been fought over and over in human history. We never seem to learn. It is time to grab our pitchforks.