Hillary Clinton and The New World Order
I watched the CNN U-Tube Democratic debate last evening. This morning I was trying to remember what exactly Hillary Clinton’s position is on anything whatsoever. I didn’t succeed except to recall that she described herself as a “modern Progressive” or something. What is a modern Progressive- one who subscribes to the goals of the Trilateral Commission, the New World Order and the disestablishment of the United States as a sovereign entity in favor of a North American Union of the USA, Canada and Mexico- created without act of Congress and without the consent of the American people and to further the greed and lust for power of a number of banks and mega-corporations which are dead set on ruling the world? You can bet that that’s indeed what “modern Progressive” means to Her Nibs. And that’s what her hubby- and coach- means by it. They both have gotten a big taste of power- and money- and they like it. All the rest is cover.
We have to get it through our thick skulls (and I most definitely include myself) that the whole ball game has changed. It no longer matters what political party a politician claims to belong to. What really matters is what they’re up to and with whom they associate when they take off their “public-servant” hat and get down to the real business.
And the fact is that - “after hours” so to speak- Bill and Hillary hang out with the global financial elite. Bill has long been a member of the Trilateral Commission. Fellow members are people like Dick Cheney, George H.W. Bush, Dianne Feinstein, top officers of banks like Wells Fargo and Chase Manhattan and corporations like Coca Cola- and so forth. And what are they up to- nothing less than the feudalization of this nation and the world in order to vastly increase their profits and consolidate their world power. Politically and financially these people are extremely intelligent and supremely adept at manipulating the media and public opinion. They are masters of image and know to a tee how to appear good and benign and public-spirited. But it’s a show.
Their game is to throw the public a few crumbs to shut them up but keep them in enough fear and debt to keep them working like slaves and not asking a lot of questions. But they’re not even bothering to throw crumbs anymore. Americans elected Democrats to Congress to end the war in Iraq. Have they done it? No, they play games and make excuses and give slumber parties. Why? Because the banks and the war industry haven’t made enough billions yet. For that matter why did they vote for the war in the first place? Hillary won’t apologize for it. Why should she? And she’ll give no real indication of when she would end the war if she were in a position to do so. She won’t end the war unless the elite really want it ended. What the public wants means absolutely nothing to these bastards. They know how to control the public and keep it at bay. About 80% of the public want the borders well protected. Has Hillary or her ilk fought for that? Of course not. Bill’s fellow members want a perpetual flow of cheap labor and that’s what they’ll get. You can provide your own additional examples. They are legion.
At present there is no effective countervailing force to the Clintons and the Bushes and their corporate, banking, media and academic confreres. But there are enough ethical and public-spirited corporations, enough moral and highly intelligent political minds, enough aware and disgusted Americans left in this country who want to be citizens and not subjects to put the brakes on this very dangerous element that has taken control of our land. They will not stop. They have to be stopped. Let’s do what we have to to retire the Bushes, the Clintons, the Cheneys and their ilk. We either get our country back or it is gone forever along with our hopes and dreams.
Postscript: I almost forgot: Ask Hillary why she voted for the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2005. For 200 years Americans had the right to secure full discharge of debts if they got into hopeless insolvency. Specified assets were still subject to creditors claims but debtors could get relief. In 2005 the banks and credit-card companies wrote legislation which effectively cancelled this federally granted right; and Hillary Clinton and a good number of other sell-out Democrats- along with the Republicans- obligingly voted it in. At present the major cause of bankruptcy is that Americans- even insured Americans- are being bled dry by the medical industry. A couple of days in the hospital can leave a family with $100,000 or more in debts. But thanks to the likes of Hillary they can no longer get full discharge; but are liable to repay for years thereafter if they acquire any appreciable cash. They stay in debt. So that's what a "progressive" is according to Clinton? Progress for whom? Not for the American people for sure.